Reasoning native current social benefits to develop business investment opportunities
During my placements in the health policy sector I’ve come across countless arguments considering health expense claims provided for/by Indigenous bands throughout Canada centring on the severity of claims against entitled social benefit claims. Controversial federal tax expenditures ranging in the multi millions provide benefit relief from federal reformers into the hands of beneficing Natives bands. The extents at which benefits exist are determined by primary health outcomes which substantiate these measurable accounts of success considering lack in equity for Natives to take on massive health financial burdens themselves.
Being reliant on the government is financially non-reciprocal, being seen as only taking finances from the government and not giving back, where local businesses lack their own insurance coverage as many First Nations and Inuit are not provided work insurance benefits that are provided for non-status southern Canadians. In southern Canada, dental service packages can be provided for entire families and can be accessed at relatively anytime for whatever procedure, pharmaceuticals can be remedied upon a moments notice and surgeons are readily available at nearly every southern location. Such medical amenities are neither readily accessible nor affordable under First Nations or Inuit benefits programs who have limited access to these provisions. For many who can obtain access, they cannot afford it living in the south.
High healthcare expenses are accounted amongst Native groups as aggregating healthcare expenses across the territorial regions is handled by the federal sector outsourcing service contracts privately for taxi-ambulance, medevac, boarding homes; all of which are provided municipally within the provinces. All these services are provided by municipalities in southern Canada but costs are shared amongst locally operated business due to small populations lacking the need of full time medical service needs.
Regulation of serviceable costs is justified by usage or average income by region but none reflective of location of provision, whereby First Nations, Inuit and non-status residents all across Northern Canada have been financially abused. Labrador and Nunavik reflect the of the lowest incomes of all Canadians yet live in some of the highest cost of living regions globally where commodities are more likely used for subsidiary means.
In defence of the federal government, mismanagement of such accounts for ambulance and travel costs vary per township in the territories many of the time by maximum personnel cost accounted. Immense spending on such service could be remediated by improving reporting strategies yet high individual transactions rates for these services, providing federal insurance initiatives into such services – ones that should improve current agreements or contracts to such regions.
Again the high cost could account for someone’s average income. When client visits are so frequent by improved economic status, governmental provisions can intervene in providing necessary services.
Having access to serviceable economies is difficult to regulate where corporations can take on insurance policies for workers and provide coverage. Access to land grants, creating or financing highly skilled workers and creating business opportunities for market economies is not a concern, though should be, for most First Nations or Inuit on or off reserve nor do most have the capacity to do so as even basic provisions are hard to come by.
Being reliant on the government is financially non-reciprocal, being seen as only taking finances from the government and not giving back, where local businesses lack their own insurance coverage as many First Nations and Inuit are not provided work insurance benefits that are provided for non-status southern Canadians. In southern Canada, dental service packages can be provided for entire families and can be accessed at relatively anytime for whatever procedure, pharmaceuticals can be remedied upon a moments notice and surgeons are readily available at nearly every southern location. Such medical amenities are neither readily accessible nor affordable under First Nations or Inuit benefits programs who have limited access to these provisions. For many who can obtain access, they cannot afford it living in the south.
High healthcare expenses are accounted amongst Native groups as aggregating healthcare expenses across the territorial regions is handled by the federal sector outsourcing service contracts privately for taxi-ambulance, medevac, boarding homes; all of which are provided municipally within the provinces. All these services are provided by municipalities in southern Canada but costs are shared amongst locally operated business due to small populations lacking the need of full time medical service needs.
Regulation of serviceable costs is justified by usage or average income by region but none reflective of location of provision, whereby First Nations, Inuit and non-status residents all across Northern Canada have been financially abused. Labrador and Nunavik reflect the of the lowest incomes of all Canadians yet live in some of the highest cost of living regions globally where commodities are more likely used for subsidiary means.
In defence of the federal government, mismanagement of such accounts for ambulance and travel costs vary per township in the territories many of the time by maximum personnel cost accounted. Immense spending on such service could be remediated by improving reporting strategies yet high individual transactions rates for these services, providing federal insurance initiatives into such services – ones that should improve current agreements or contracts to such regions.
Again the high cost could account for someone’s average income. When client visits are so frequent by improved economic status, governmental provisions can intervene in providing necessary services.
Having access to serviceable economies is difficult to regulate where corporations can take on insurance policies for workers and provide coverage. Access to land grants, creating or financing highly skilled workers and creating business opportunities for market economies is not a concern, though should be, for most First Nations or Inuit on or off reserve nor do most have the capacity to do so as even basic provisions are hard to come by.
Indigenous Canadians are entitled and encouraged to do so yet Indigenous groups are still plagued with high rates of mental instability, rates of imprisonment, low grade averages in high school completion and lack of child development strategy. Business creation and developing trade policies, nationally and international are whole hearted entitlements of Aboriginal groups yet many groups are lacking knowledge in these realms, considered the most competitive and important within developed society.
This dilemma that Native groups lack opportunity to create competitive large scale business venture opportunities without government support could provide hurdle themselves into self government taking on their own health and education challenges and giving them opportunities to support the federal government instead of becoming just another government expense.
Comments
Post a Comment