Examining Structure I Methane clathrate phase destabilization

This study considers only structure I methane hydrates as they are the abundant. It is a white compound crystal cubic lattice parameter of 12.0 cm, similar in the appearance of snow and stable at about 275 and 290k.

What are methane gas clathrates:

Clathrate hydrates, otherwise known as gas hydrate, are crystalline compounds that alter water molecules to form cavities where methane molecules bonds. As water molecules surround hydrogen bonds, A-polar or slightly polar methane molecules occupy cavities. The type of cavity that forms and corresponds agrees to different types of cavities, reforming and corresponding to various cavity types, varying on the size of guest molecules. These microscopic structures depends upon existing molecules due to the instability of existing methane or ethanol molecules. There are three known gas hydrate structure denoted into I, II, and H; each involving 5 water cages coordinated by the numbers 20, 24, 28 and 36. Small molecules such as methane stabilize three small cages under 20 and 24 coordinates. Large molecules such as propane and methylcyclohexane stabilize larger cages under coordinate numbers 28 and 36. Guest molecules must not be too big or small compared with cavity sizes. A ratio of molecule diameter to cavity diameter is approximately 0.75 to be optimal.

The melting of structure I methane has been investigated using molecular dynamics simulations for a number of potential energy models. The equilibrated hydrate crystals are stabile at a density of 0.92 g/cm at an 5k timescores starting at 270 K, clocking mechanical instability at 330 K in 11 nanoseconds.


Clathrate Structure Dynamics

The stability of methane clathrates hydrates in additive and rigid hydrate molecules helps to describe interactions between methane and water molecules denoted within the 3 model type methane structures.
An accepted hypotheses by Muller Bongartz states that the pentagonal dodecahedron is the first nucleon seed, as it “could be the longest lived structure in ‘isochoric melt’”. Water clusters form around the a-polar solute, agglomerate and change coordination numbers. Metallurgical studies show that this is an unlikely that a order phase nucleate in different phases will produce symmetry distinct from the final crystal.

For example, structure I hydrates have 8 unit cells, namely 64 methane molecules and 368 water molecules. This models stability is much higher then other structures regarding melting temperatures of methane clathrate hydrate cages. Accounting hystereis in the heat/melt system, observed initial energy, pressure and structure properties emulate energy structure properties of a common system. When supercooled, this hydrate liquid mixture will phase separate rather than reform crystal.

Phase Stability of Gas Hydrates

Modeling simulations of structural kinetics and mechanisms of formation of natural gas hydrates is a first step to analyze the mechanical stability of hydrate lattices. To our knowledge, prior simulations have not yet determined the melting point/instability in hydrate lattices. Knowledge of both is important in estimating the cause and degree of ‘driving’ force required during nucleation. Crystals may melt at equilibrium to de-structuralize to some degree. Thermodynamic melting points provide temperatures where free energies in solid and liquid phases are standardized as heterogeneous processes can identify extrinsic lattice defects. Molecular mechanics separate the lattice, collapsing it due to instability or other mechanical instances depending on the structural melting point.

Polarizing potential yield variables will affect pair potentials in both crystals and liquid states. The effects of perturbation and attraction forces of methane potentially cause only small changes in upper-bound mechanical stability, always being higher than its thermodynamic melting points.

Adding and lowering pressure increases simulation estimates by a factor of 200, from 5 ps to 100 ps, lowering the upper bound limits for total mechanical stability from 375K down to 340K, whereby the clathrate structure can breakdown after 1 ns. After 11 ns the system at 330K is still stable.

For this to be precise, collecting functions of temperature both in time before molecular breakdown are estimated from 3 periodic boundary conditions:

I) Molecules are locked in a constant density
II) Obtaining structures with minimal to no lattice defects
III) Approximate ratio of potential model of water and guest molecules in structure

The isobaric filling fraction of the cavities yield these results.

Findings

Only a few molecules are completely surrounded by water in a clathrate structure, agreeing with the low solubility of methane molecules. Polar molecules aggregate with atrophicaly, solvating in agreement with ionic bonds. It is important to emphasize that investigators have never seen clathrates form spontaneously from solution phases simulations in absence of seed crystals. The natures of two phase simulations have lower free energy potentials one must correspond to a supercooled solution. In this state, apolar solute molecules aggregate as they would in liquid equilibrium.

In other free energy minimum states, the geometry is completely different. The Apolar solutes are completely surround by water molecules. This spontaneous formation of this clathrate phase has not been seen in such simulations.

Upon cooling of these structures, the system phase separates into two phases, a methane rich liquid that adopts natural spherical curves shaped in zero atms and water rich phases in which methane has low solubility. The phase separation can exist at temperatures as low as 200K without affecting the phase separation. This study shoes that current additive potential energies of model methane in water does sufficiently simulate phase diagrams of methane destabilization.

Comments